Bråten, 2019 Impact of CYP2C19 genotype on sertraline exposure in 1200 Scandinavian patients

[Erimus]

Neuropsychopharmacology. Epub 2019 Oct 24. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-019-0554-x

Impact of CYP2C19 genotype on sertraline exposure in 1200 Scandinavian patients

Bråten L, Haslemo T, Jukic M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Molden E, Kringen M K.

 

Abstract

Sertraline is an (SSRI-)antidepressant metabolized by the polymorphic CYP2C19 enzyme. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of CYP2C19 genotype on the serum concentrations of sertraline in a large patient population. Second, the proportions of patients in the various CYP2C19 genotype-defined subgroups obtaining serum concentrations outside the therapeutic range of sertraline were assessed. A total of 2190 sertraline serum concentration measurements from 1202 patients were included retrospectively from the drug monitoring database at Diakonhjemmet Hospital in Oslo. The patients were divided into CYP2C19 genotype-predicted phenotype subgroups, i.e. normal (NMs), ultra rapid (UMs), intermediate (IMs), and poor metabolisers (PMs). The differences in dose-harmonized serum concentrations of sertraline and N-desmethylsertraline-to-sertraline metabolic ratio were compared between the subgroups, with CYP2C19 NMs set as reference. The patient proportions outside the therapeutic concentration range were also compared between the subgroups with NMs defined as reference. Compared with the CYP2C19 NMs, the sertraline serum concentration was increased 1.38-fold (95% CI 1.26–1.50) and 2.68-fold (95% CI 2.16–3.31) in CYP2C19 IMs and PMs, respectively (p < 0.001), while only a marginally lower serum concentration (−10%) was observed in CYP2C19 UMs (p = 0.012). The odds ratio for having a sertraline concentration above the therapeutic reference range was 1.97 (95% CI 1.21–3.21, p = 0.064) and 8.69 (95% CI 3.88–19.19, p < 0.001) higher for IMs and PMs vs. NMs, respectively. CYP2C19 IMs and PMs obtain significantly higher serum concentrations of sertraline than NMs. Based on the relative differences in serum concentrations compared to NMs, dose reductions of 60% and 25% should be considered in PMs and IMs, respectively, to reduce the risk of sertraline overexposure in these patients.

 

 

Free full text: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31649299/

 

 

Comment:

This study gives you an idea of how vastly different serum concentrations of sertraline can be for different metabolisers of the drug. A poor metaboliser taking 50mg could see up to 2.7 fold increases in serum concentration compared to a normal metaboliser, so you can see where the serotonin toxicity starts to become a problem. Poor metabolisers should have dose reductions of 60% to compensate for this, meaning instead of being tested on 50mg like the rest of the population, the starting point should be 20mg.

 

Perhaps with wider spread genetic testing the number of severe adverse reactions to medication could be reduced.

Edited October 16 by Erimus

[Vancouver1986]

On 10/16/2024 at 7:36 AM, Erimus said:

Perhaps with wider spread genetic testing the number of severe adverse reactions to medication could be reduced.

I've thoroughly looked up information for all of my garbage 'medications' on go.drugbank.com many many times since late 2021.

 

But this type of info is also interesting to look into if I'd like. I've already found so many articles on I.R. Seroquel, X.R. Seroquel, Pristiq, etc - regarding Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics. I've had to in order to help Psychiatrists/Psych Wards/In-Patient Facilities help me. I was still medically gaslit about iatrogenic inuries and acute w/d. But at least I showed more assertiveness and self-assuredness and self-aware and looked in to things and didn't blindly trust. I could've been even more Poly-Drugged. But I was still only Poly-Drugged because I was unwell on nonsense Rx's my physiology was already in a chemical dependence to to advocate harder. It's an incredibly vulnerable state to be in, eh?

 

It's literally the exact same story for all of us victims/survivors of Psychotropic Pharmaceuticals.

 

Keep advocating for yourself.

 

 

[LukeUK]

It's totally ridiculous that science doesn't have a clear idea of how these drugs work, and that the work to figure that out is being done decades after they're introduced.